SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.P.Sen : B.C.Ray
Beda Nand Singh
Versus
Director General, Central Industrial Security Force And Another
Case No. : 1482 , 1483 of 1987
Date of Decision : 7/20/87
Administrative tribunals Act, 1985 - Section 19 - Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 - Section 3(1) – Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 32 - Termination from services - Tribunal had no jurisdiction - Court had by order issued notice in Special Leave Petition and permitted appellants to withdraw connected petition under Article 32 of Constitution filed by them with liberty to move Central Administrative tribunal – Thereafter appellants made an application against termination of their services by impugned orders passed by Commandant central Industrial Security Force Bharat Coking Coal Limited under Section 19 of Administrative tribunals Act, 1985, before central Administrative tribunal – Held, After hearing learned counsel for parties court feel that in circumstances matter should be remitted back to High court for deter- mining questions raised in writ petition - In view of Section 3(1) of Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 there can be no doubt that appellants were members of Armed Force of the Union as held by Tribunal - That being so tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain applications in view of Section 2(a) of Administrative tribunals Act, 1985 - Court accordingly allow appeals set aside judgment and order of High court dismissing writ petition in liming and direct that High court shall hear and dispose of same on merits as expeditiously as possible – Appeals allow
(1) SPECIAL leave granted. Arguments heard.
(2) WE had by order dated 1/10/1986 issued notice in Special Leave Petition No. 5880 of 1986 and permitted the appellants to withdraw the connected petition under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by them, with liberty to move the Central Administrative tribunal. Thereafter, the appellants made an application against the termination of their services by the impugned orders passed by the Commandant, central Industrial Security Force, Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad under S. 19 of the Administrative tribunals Act, 1985, before the central Administrative tribunal, Patna bench but the tribunal by its order dated 18/11/1986 at the stage of admission returned the appli- cation on the ground that the tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the application made inasmuch as the appellants admittedly were members of the Armed Force of the Union by reason of S. 2(a) of the Act.
(3) AFTER hearing learned counsel for the parties, we feel that in the circumstances the matter should be remitted back to the High court for deter- mining the questions raised in the writ petition. In view of S. 3(1 of the Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968, there can be no doubt that the appellants were members of the Armed Force of the Union, as held by the Tribunal. That being so, the tribunal had no jurisdiction to entertain the applications in view of S. 2(a) of the Administrative tribunals Act, 1985.
(4) WE accordingly allow the appeals, set aside the judgment and order of the High court dismissing the writ petition in limine and direct that the High court shall hear and dispose of the same on merits as expeditiously as possible. No costs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.