SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 288

G.L.OZA, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Annapoorani Ammal – Appellant
Versus
G. Thangapalam – Respondent


Advocates:
ANJANI, J.RAMAMURTHY, K.K.MANI, K.RAM KUMAR, R.VAIGAI, S.Padmanabhan

Judgment

G.L. OZA, J.

(1) LEAVE granted. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

(2) FACTS necessary for this appeal are, that the petitioner appellant-original defendant purchased the suit property by registered sale deed dated 27/12/1950 executed by Asirvada Nadar, Ponnammal and Devadasan in favour of the present petitioner appellant for a consideration of Rs. 7,000.00 . On January 4, 1951 the present respondent executed a rent agreement in favour of the present appellant for the building acknowledging her as her landlady Rs. 80.00 per month.

(3) IN 1963 the mother of the appellant by name of Ramalakshmi Ammal died. In 1974 the respondent filed the suit from which the present appeal arises viz. Suit No. 79 of 1974 against the petitioner appellant for conveyance of the property by the petitioner in favour of the respondent on the ground of a Yadast which was for the first time produced with the suit and is alleged to have been written by the mother of the petitioner on 24/12/1950 which is marked as Ex. A-11, in favour of the respondent. This document provided that respondent could get conveyance of the property in the suit from the petitioner after paying the sa























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top