SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1280

K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Central Coalfields LTD. – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


(1) AMENDMENT of the cause title is allowed. Intervention application is dismissed.

(2) THIS appeal by special leave arises from the order of the division bench of the Madhya Pradesh High court dated 3/5/1985, made in Miscellaneous Petition No. 1260 of 1982. The appellant challenged in the above writ petition the directions dated 4/5/1981, order dated 30/9/1981 and a further order dated 9/6/1982 passed by the second respondent-chairman of Special Areas Development Authority (for short SADA), Singrauli, in the District of Sidhi ofM.P. directing the appellant under Section 26 of the M.P. Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam, 1973 (for short Adhiniyam) to pull down the constructions of the office buildings, staff quarters etc. made by the appellant contrary to the provisions of the Adhiniyam. In the High court, the controversy centred round the question as to whether the provisions of the Adhiniyam overlap the field occupied by the provisions of the Coal Act, the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development) Act and Mines and Minerals (Regulations and Development) Act, 1957 (for short the Act), The division bench held that these Acts have not occupied the field covered













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top