SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 234

KULDIP SINGH, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Block Development Officers Association – Appellant
Versus
State Of M. P. – Respondent


(1) APPELLANTS 2-8 originally belonged to the Panchayat and Social Welfare Department of the State of Madhya Pradesh. They were sent on deputation as Block Development Officers (BDOs) to the Panchayat and Rural Development Department. It is not disputed that the appellants worked in the Rural Development Department as BDOs for a period between 5-12 years. The rules called the Madhya Pradesh Panchayat and Rural Development (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1988 (the Rules) came into force with effect from 11/4/1988. Thereafter the appellants were reverted back to their parent department. They challenged the order of reversion before the Madhya Pradesh Administrative tribunal. The tribunal by its judgment dated 8/6/1992/30/6/19922 dismissed the bunch applications filed by the appellants. These appeals by way of special leave are against the judgment of the tribunal.

(2) WE have heard learned counsel for the parties. We see no ground to interfere with the impugned judgment of the tribunal. We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions reached therein. The learned counsel for the appellants has, however, contended that during the period the appellants were working

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top