SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 393

M.H.KANIA, P.B.SAWANT
M. L. Sud – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


(1) THIS writ petition relates to an area comprising about 435 acres of land near Greater Kailash Part II in New Delhi and known as Jahanpana Forest. In the Master Plan this area has been shown as "Green" and it is to be maintained as a City Forest. The petitioners have come to this Court with allegations that the Delhi Development Authority (referred to hereinafter as "DDA") is denuding the said forest by cutting trees and putting up construction and laying roads.

(2) LEARNED counsel for the DDA denies these allegations and states that, in fact, the plantation of trees and plants in the said area has been done by the DDA and it has no intention of trying to denude the forest.

(3) WE do not propose to enter into the correctness of the aforesaid allegations because DDA through its counsel gives an undertaking to this Court that no tree will be felled in the said area except in the case of dis- eased trees and even before such a tree is felled the DDA will take permission of the Head of the Horticulture Department of DDA.

(4) IT is further agreed by the DDA that no construction will be made in the said area except for providing sanitary facilities to pers


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top