SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 189

P.B.SAWANT, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Premchand Ranka – Appellant
Versus
A. Vasanthraj Khatod – Respondent


ORDER

1. Special leave granted.

2. It is true that all the courts have held that the appellant is a wilful defaulter although he has paid the arrears in lump sum. But the fact remains that the payment made in lump sum has been accepted by the landlord and this method of payment went on for quite a long time. In the circumstances we do not think that there is wilful default on the part of the tenant. The finding of the courts below the seems to be too technical.

3. We, therefore, set aside the eviction order. We also direct that the appellant-tenant shall pay all the arrears, if any, up-to-date within a month from today and also pay the rent hereafterwards regularly months by months. The appellant however shall pay the costs of the respondent which we estimate at Rs. 3000.

4. The appeal is allowed accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top