SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 635

E.S.VENKATARAMIAH, N.D.OJHA
Niadar – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Administration – Respondent


ORDER

1. Petitioner 1 is a casual labourer on daily wages working in the soil Conservation Department, Agriculture Section, Delhi Administration Delhi and Petitioner 2 is the Union of Casual Labourers working in the said department. They have prayed for the issue of the direction to the Delhi Administration and to the Union of India to regularise their services and also to pay each of them until such regularisation the minimum salary payable to be person regularly employed in a comparable posts in the department. It is stated that many of the casual labourers working in the above said department have been working for nearly 20 years as casual labourers.

2. Following a number of decision rendered by this Court on the question of regularisation of casual workers and the need for paying them the minimum salary payable to a regular employee in a comparable post, we issue a direction to the Delhi Administration to prepare a scheme for absorbing the casual labourers who have worked for one year and more in the Soil Conservation Department as regular employees within six months from today and to absorb all such casual labourers who are found fit to be regularised under the scheme as regul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top