SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 3

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, K.N.SAIKIA
Inderjit Kaur – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
K.K.GUPTA, Parmanand Katara, Prabha Dubey

(1) IN this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution the validity of S. 125 Criminal Procedure Code has been challenged on the Ground that the S. unreasonably limits the maintenance to Rs. 500.00 for individual. S. 125 provides a speedy remedy against starvation of the civil liabilities of parties. The order made thereunder is tentative and it is subject to the final determination of the rights in civil court. We, therefore, see no reason to issue rule nisi. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top