KULDIP SINGH, S.NATARAJAN
Jaloba – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
(1) THIS appeal under S. 16 ofthe Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prvention) Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) has been preferred bythe appellant to challenge his conviction under S. 25 ofthe Arms Act read with S. 6 ofthe Act andthe sentence of RI for two years and fine of Rs. 500.00 awarded therefor.
(2) THE prosecution case was that duringthe early hours of 7/04/1986 Le. at about 3.15 or 3.30 a.m. Public Witness 4 Sub-inspector Tika Ram along with Head Constable Public Witness 3 Hans Raj and other policemen were doing Nakabandi nearthe culvert of a canal in village Ghudwali. At that time they sawthe appellant coming alongthe road but when he tried to retrace his steps on seeingthe police party, they gave chase to him and apprehended him.the appellant was having a M.L. Gun (Ex. P-1 and 6 topis (caps) Exs. P-3 to P-8 and a plastic vial (Ex. P-9 containing about 25 grams of gunpowder. He had no licence for carryingthe firearm and could not offer any explanation for his possession ofthe firearm andthe caps and gunpowder. He was, therefore arrested and later charged under Section 25 ofthe Arms Act read with S. 6 ofthe Act.
(3) THE prosecution ex
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.