SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(SC) 636

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, M.H.KANIA, O.CHHINNAPPA REDDY
State Of U. P. – Appellant
Versus
Chhotey Lal Pandey – Respondent


(1) WE think, it is really unnecessary to go into the merits of this appeal. The orders of the government of Uttar Pradesh identifying the backward classes for recruitment of posts of Munsifs were struck down on the ground that the backward classes had not been properly identified. We are told that subsequently another Commission had been appointed to go into that question and the Commission has submitted a report and it is stated to be under the consideration of the State government. We, therefore, do not think it necessary to go into the merits of the appeal. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top