SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 363

S.NATARAJAN, S.R.PANDIAN
State of A. P. – Appellant
Versus
Dar-u-salam Education Trust – Respondent


(1) THOUGH arguments were advanced at length by the learned counsel appearing for the parties on the main question whether the private Medical College founded by the respondent Trust should be given recognition by the Medical council and affiliation by the University (there being a subsidiary issue as to whether the affiliation should be given by the Osmania University or the newly formed University of Health Services), the limited question requiring consideration at this stage is whether the students already admitted to the college should be permitted to appear at the university examinations to be held shortly. So far as this question is concerned, it is necessary to state that the first batch of 100 students admitted in the year 1984-85 and the second batch of 50 students admitted in the year 1985-86 have been admitted on the basis of the provisional permission granted by the State Government itself. The next batch of 100 students admitted in the year 1986-87 have been admitted by the College without obtaining any specific permission from the government or orders of court. During the year 1987-88 there were no admissions. For the year 1988-89, this court permitted the Col




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top