SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 130

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.Ranganathan : Sabyasachi Mukharjee
Manjit Singh Grewal Alias Gogi
Versus
Union Of India
Case No. : 168 of 1989
Date of Decision : 3/2/89

Headnote:

Conservation of Foreign Exchange & Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3(1) - Violation of procedural safeguards - Copies of documents were supplied – Quash of order - High court dismissed criminal writ petition on ground that there was no violation of procedural safeguards in this case - Appellant has been detained under an order under Section 3(1) of Conservation of Foreign Exchange & Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - It appears that appellant had asked for certain copies of documents which admittedly were there with the respondent - Union of India – Held, Court are of opinion that safeguards provided by Constitution have not been followed - In that view of matter decision of High court cannot be sustained and therefore is set aside - Order of detention is quashed and appellant be set at liberty unless he is required in respect of any other proceedings - Appeal is disposed of

(1) SPECIAL leave granted.

(2) THIS an appeal from the decision of the High court of Delhi, dated 30/11/1988. The High court dismissed the criminal writ petition on the ground that there was no violation of the procedural safeguards in this case. The appellant has been detained under an order dated 9/06/1988 under S. 3(1 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange & Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.

(3) IT appears that the appellant had asked for certain copies of the documents which admittedly were there with the respondent - Union of India. Copies of the documents were supplied, but the same were not legible. This position is also apparent. It is not necessary in the facts of this case to go into the question whether these documents were relevant or material.

(4) IN view of the fact that the copies of the documents were, in fact, supplied at the request of the appellant, but the copies supplied were illegible, we are of the opinion, that the safeguards provided by the Constitution have not been followed. In that view of the matter the decision of the High court cannot be sustained and, therefore, is set aside. The order of detention dated 9/06/1988 is quashed and the appellant be set at liberty unless he is required in respect of any other proceedings.

(5) THE appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top