SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 254

K.RAMASWAMY, M.M.PUNCHHI
Sheela Chadha – Appellant
Versus
Achharaj Ram Seghal – Respondent


(1) S. 12 of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 gives right to a landlord to recover possession of non-residential rented premises for bona fide use of his unmarried daughter. The provision is in the following terms:

"12. (l)(f) ...that the accommodation let for non-residential purposes is required bona fide by the landlord for the purpose of continuing starting his business or that of any of his major sons or unmarried daughters if he is the owner thereof or for any person for whose benefit the accommodation is held and that the landlord or such person has no other reasonably suitable non-residential accommodation of his own in his occupation in the city or town concerned."

(2) THE respondent herein, Dr A.R. Seghal, is engaged in the practice of Homeopathy medicine. So is his wife and an unmarried daughter by the name of Rajini Seghal. As it has emerged from the pleadings of the parties and the orders of the first court as also the first appellate court, the landlord was able to secure eviction of a large portion of the building part of which is the premises in the instant case, comprising of two rooms of 10 x 10, which being in the occupation of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top