SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(SC) 376

P.B.SAWANT, RANGANATH MISRA, KULDIP SINGH
Awadh Rai – Appellant
Versus
Mewalal Rai – Respondent


Advocates:
GYAN SUDHA MISHRA, S.K.Sinha

(1) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. We are of the view that the statutory scheme of the Bihar Consolidation of Holdings (Prevention of Fragmentation) Act, 1956 does not bring about an automatic abatement of the pending proceedings in the civil court but it is not necessary that a formal application should be made; if and when the matter is brought to the notice of the court that the relevant notification under the Consolidation Act has been made, the court after hearing the partics can make an order to the effect that there is an abatement. On the question of abatement of the appeal, it is open to either of parties to move the High court, if so advised, but we express no opinion on merits. The special leave petition is disposed of.

ASSTT. Registrar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top