K.N.SAIKIA, N.M.KASLIWAL, T.K.THOMMEN
Hamda Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Avadiappapathar – Respondent
A sale deed executed in favor of a vendee prior to attachment before judgment of the property, but registered thereafter, prevails over the attachment and confers valid title upon the vendee as against the attaching creditor (and any auction purchaser in execution of the decree obtained by such creditor), since: (i) a sale of immovable property is complete on execution of the deed (with consideration), subject only to mandatory registration; (ii) under Section 47 of the Registration Act, a registered document of such nature takes effect/operates/relates back from its date of execution (and not registration); (iii) Order XXXVIII Rule 10 CPC expressly protects pre-existing rights of persons not parties to the suit from the effect of attachment before judgment; (iv) Order XXXVIII Rule 5 CPC applies only where a defendant is about to dispose of property with intent to obstruct execution of decree, not to a completed prior sale; and (v) Section 64 CPC voids only private transfers or delivery of interest after attachment, but submission for registration of a pre-existing executed sale deed is neither a transfer nor prohibited/delivery by the order of attachment. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) [1000298430003][1000298430012][1000298430016]
Judgment
N.M.KASLIWAL, J.
(1) THIS Civilby special leave is directed against the judgment of High court of Judicature at Madras dated 24/12/1982. This case raises a short but an important question of law. We would narrate only such facts of the case which are necessary for the disposal of the question of law raised in the case. The appellant Hamda Ammal purchased the suit property from the respondents Govindraju Pathar, Muthulinga Asari and Gurusami Pathar (hereinafter referred to as the vendors) by a sale deed executed in her favour on 9/09/1970. Harnda Ammal got the sale deed registered on 26/10/1970. Before registration of the sale deed, respondent Avadiappa filed a money suit for the recovery of Rs. 5,200.00 on 13/09/1970, against the vendors and obtained attachment before judgment of the property in question on 17/09/1970. Subsequently the aforesaid money suit filed by Avadiappa was also decreed in his favour. The question which calls for consideration is whether Hamda Ammal is entitled to the property sold in her favour by virtue of sale deed dated 9/09/1970 but registered subsequently on 26/10/1970, or Avadiappa has a better claim to the property on acco
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.