SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 643

B.C.RAY, N.D.OJHA
Kashmir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent


(1) AFTER hearing learned counsel for both the parties and also con- sidering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find that there is any infirmity in appraisal of the facts and circumstances and the cir- cumstantial evidence by both the courts below in arriving at the conclu- sion that the accused-appellant has committed the crime under Section 302 IPC. We, therefore, agree with the findings of the courts below so far as the conviction of the appellant under S. 302 Indian Penal Code is con- cerned. However, it was not a premeditated and cold-blooded murder. Furthermore, the appellant immediately after the murder was committed appeared before the Sessions Judge and made a confessional statement that he committed the murder. Considering all these facts and circum- stances, we are of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met by con- verting the sentence from one of death to one of imprisonment for life. As such we uphold the conviction but modify the sentence accordingly.

(2) THE appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top