B.C.RAY, N.D.OJHA
Kashmir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of H. P. – Respondent
(1) AFTER hearing learned counsel for both the parties and also con- sidering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find that there is any infirmity in appraisal of the facts and circumstances and the cir- cumstantial evidence by both the courts below in arriving at the conclu- sion that the accused-appellant has committed the crime under Section 302 IPC. We, therefore, agree with the findings of the courts below so far as the conviction of the appellant under S. 302 Indian Penal Code is con- cerned. However, it was not a premeditated and cold-blooded murder. Furthermore, the appellant immediately after the murder was committed appeared before the Sessions Judge and made a confessional statement that he committed the murder. Considering all these facts and circum- stances, we are of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met by con- verting the sentence from one of death to one of imprisonment for life. As such we uphold the conviction but modify the sentence accordingly.
(2) THE appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.