SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 643

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
B.C.Ray : N.D.Ojha
Kashmir Singh
Versus
State Of H.P.
Case No. : 206 of 1988
Date of Decision : 10/5/88

Headnote:

Indian Penal Code - Section 302 – Offence of murder - Imprisonment for life - Court do not find that there is any infirmity in appraisal of facts and circumstances and the circumstantial evidence by both courts below in arriving at conclusion that accused-appellant has committed crime under Section 302 IPC – Held, it was not a premeditated and cold-blooded murder – Furthermore appellant immediately after murder was committed appeared before Sessions Judge and made a confessional statement that he committed murder - Considering all these facts and circumstances court are of opinion that ends of justice will be met by converting sentence from one of death to one of imprisonment for life - As such court uphold conviction but modify sentence accordingly - Appeal is allowed

(1) AFTER hearing learned counsel for both the parties and also con- sidering the facts and circumstances of the case, we do not find that there is any infirmity in appraisal of the facts and circumstances and the cir- cumstantial evidence by both the courts below in arriving at the conclu- sion that the accused-appellant has committed the crime under Section 302 IPC. We, therefore, agree with the findings of the courts below so far as the conviction of the appellant under S. 302 Indian Penal Code is con- cerned. However, it was not a premeditated and cold-blooded murder. Furthermore, the appellant immediately after the murder was committed appeared before the Sessions Judge and made a confessional statement that he committed the murder. Considering all these facts and circum- stances, we are of the opinion that the ends of justice will be met by con- verting the sentence from one of death to one of imprisonment for life. As such we uphold the conviction but modify the sentence accordingly.

(2) THE appeal is allowed to the aforesaid extent.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top