SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 608

K.RAMASWAMY, S.R.PANDIAN
Lakshmanasami Gounder – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Selvamani – Respondent


Advocates:
C.T.SELVAMANI, K.PARASARAN ATTORNEY, K.V.VIJAYAKUMAR, P.P.TRIPATHI, V.BALACHANDRAN

Judgment

K. RAMASWAMY, J.

(1) SPECIAL leave is granted.

(2) THIS appeal is against the judgment dated 4/04/1991 of the Madras High court. A sum of Rs. 12,163.50 was alleged to have been misappropriated by the appellant (now he was acquitted of the charge of misappropriation) and for the recovery thereof his 13.07 acres of coffee estate situated in Semmanthaputhur village was brought to sale under the Tamil Nadu Revenue Recovery Act, 1864 (for short the Act). On 30/03/1979 the sale by auction was held by the Tahsildar. Respondent 1 purchased for a sum of Rs. 12,225.00 and deposited a sum of Rs. 2,000.00 being 15 per cent of the sale price. Under S. 36 of the Act, respondent 1 should have deposited the balance consideration within 30 days from the date of the auction. On 23/10/1981 the sale was confirmed and the balance amount was deposited on 4/11/1981. The appellant filed an application but by proceeding dated 23/10/1981, the Revenue Divisional Officer overruled the objections and dismissed the application. On appeal the Additional District Collector, Salem set aside the sale on 13/10/1982. Respondent 1 filed Writ Petition No. 246 of 1984 in the High court. The learned




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top