SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 292

N.D.OJHA, J.S.VERMA, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Hindustan Zinc LTD. – Appellant
Versus
A. P. State Electricity Board – Respondent


(1) BY these applications the appellants seek directions of this court to enable them to pay in reasonable instalments the arrears of electricity charges that became recoverable by the respondent-Board pursuant to the judgment dismissing appellants appeals. Appellants submit that the quantum of the arrears runs into crores of rupees and that appellants industries would virtually be exposed by the crippling liability to closure. Appellants say that if some breathing time is allowed, it would, while ena- bling the State Electricity Board to recover all its legitimate dues, also enable the appellants to survive.

(2) WE are afraid these are matters essentially for the Electricity Board to decide taking into account the particularities of the circumstances and hardships of each individual case. It is also necessary for the appellants to realise that the Electricity Board has itself borrowed money on high rates of compound interest and that if appellants withhold payment of electricity charges the functions of the Board itself would become difficult.

(3) AFTER considering the matter we suggested to the learned counsel on both sides that the appellants should within

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top