SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 302

Y. Narasimha – Appellant
Versus
Y. Venkatalakshmi – Respondent


Advocates:
C.K.Suchitra, C.N.SRI KUMAR, G.Prabhakar, M.C.BHANDARE

JUDGMENT

J. - Leave is granted. Appeal is taken on board for final hearing by consent of parties.

2. Appellant 1 and respondent 1 were married at Tirupati on February 27, 1975. They separated in July 1978. Appellant 1 filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County Missouri, USA. Respondent 1 sent her reply from the here under protest. The Circuit Court passed a decree for dissolution of marriage on February 19, 1980 in the absence of respondent 1.

3. Appellant 1 had earlier filed a petition for dissolution of marriage in the Sub-Court of Tirupati being O.P. No. 87 of 1976. In that petition, appellant 1 filed an application for dismissing the same as not pressed in view of the decree passed by the Missouri Court. On August 14, 1981 the learned Sub-Judge of Tirupati dismissed the petition.

4. On November 2, 1981, appellant 1 married appellant 2 in Yadgirigutta. Hence, respondent 1 filled a criminal complaint against the appellants for the offence of bigamy. It is not necessary to refer to the details of the proceedings in the said complaint. Suffice it to say that in that complaint, the appellants filed an application for their discharge in the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top