SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 77

M.FATHIMA BEEVI, P.B.SAWANT
Rattan Chand Hira Chand – Appellant
Versus
Askarnawazjung – Respondent


Advocates:
DILIP PILLAI, G.A.SHAH, N.M.POPLI, P.K.PALLI, S.B.Bhasme, V.J.Francis

JUDGMENT

SAWANT, J. - Although the leave granted by this Court is limited to the question whether the plaintiff is entitled to an amount of Rs. 75,000 which according to him he had actually advanced and the respondents had received for the purpose of prosecuting their litigation, and, therefore, the issue to be answered lies within a narrow compass, it is necessary to state the relevant facts briefly to understand correctly the significance of the question to be answered.

2. Nawab Salar Jung III, a celebrity of the erstwhile State of Hyderabad expired on March 2, 1949 leaving behind him no issue but a vast estate. As was expected, several persons came forward claiming to be his heirs, and among them were Sajjid Yar Jung and Turab Yar Jung who claimed to be his first cousins. The Nizam by a notification of May 9, 1949, appointed a Committee to administer the estate of the late Nawab Salar Jung. On the merger of the Hyderabad State, the Central Government by the Nawab Salar Jung Bahadur (Administration of Assets) Act, 1950, continued the Committee and also provided that no suit or other legal proceeding for the enforcement of any right or remedy in respect of any asset, shall be inst



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top