SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 278

A.P.SEN, L.M.SHARMA
Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti – Appellant
Versus
Bhupinder Kaur – Respondent


(1) SPECIAL leave granted. Arguments heard.

(2) WE find it rather difficult to sustain the order passed by the High court allowing the writ petition purporting to act under Order VIII rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. We regret to say that there is complete non-application of mind on the part of the High court. It failed to appreciate that s. 141 of the Code read with the Explanation thereto, as inserted by the Amending Act 104 of 1976, expressly makes the Code inapplicable to proceedings underArt.226of the Constitution. That being so,the writ petition has to be remitted to the High court for hearing afresh after notice to the parties.

(3) THE High court shall permit the respondents to file their return within a specified time and also allow the appellant to file its rejoinder. 4. The appeal is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top