SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1988 Supreme(SC) 415

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S.Ranganathan : Sabyasachi Mukharjee
Mysore Metal Industries
Versus
Collector Of Customs, Bombay
Case No. : 342 (nm) of 1987
Date of Decision : 5/11/88

Headnote:

Constitution Of India,1950 - Claim before tribunal - CEGAT - Density Polyethylene Moulding Powder - Appeal from the order of Customs Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate tribunal hereinafter called CEGAT tribunal held that appellants would succeed in their claim before tribunal only if they could show that goods imported were High Density Polyethylene Moulding Powder - According to the Tribunal appellants had failed do this hence tribunal was of view that the appellants were not eligible for the benefit of exemption notification amended and applicable at material time in respect of imported product –Held, Appellants were also not entitled to refund which is consequential to benefit under notification - In premises tribunal refused to interfere with the order of lower authorities and dismissed appeal Court find that tribunal arrived at its finding on an examination of all relevant and legal materials including chemical test report burden is on party who claims exemption to prove that entitled him to exemption appellant has failed to discharge onus - As tribunal arrived at its conclusion based on relevant and circumstances there is no scope or ground for interference with order of tribunal - In this premises this appeal is rejected - Appeal disposed

(1) THIS is an appeal from the order of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate tribunal, hereinafter called the CEGAT. The tribunal held that the appellants would succeed in their claim before the tribunal only if they could show that the goods imported were High Density Polyethylene Moulding Powder. According to the Tribunal the appellants had failed to do this, hence, the tribunal was of the view that the appellants were not eligible for the benefit of the exemption notification No.227\76 as amended and applicable at the material time in respect of imported product. According to the tribunal the appellants were also not entitled to the refund which is consequential to the benefit under notification. In the premises the tribunal refused to interfere with the order of lower authorities and dismissed the appeal.

(2) WE find that the tribunal arrived at its finding on an examination of all the relevant and legal materials including the chemical test report. The burden is on the party who claims exemption, to prove the facts that entitled him to exemption. The appellant has failed to discharge the onus. As the tribunal arrived at its conclusion based on the relevant facts and circumstances, there is no scope or ground for interference with the order of the tribunal. In this premises this appeal is rejected.

(3) COUNSEL for the appellant stated that some of the matters are pending between the parties. The same would be disposed of in accordance with law on the basis of material available in those proceedings.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top