SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 Supreme(SC) 512

M.FATHIMA BEEVI, S.R.PANDIAN
Madanlal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent


(1) THE above appeal is preferred by the appellant, Madanlal who was aged about 18 at the time of occurrence challenging the correctness of the judgment made by the High court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in Crl. A. No. 576 of 1976 whereunder he stands convicted under S. 302 Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. The High court on appeal has confirmed the conviction and the sentence. Hence this appeal.

(2) IT is seen from the records that leave was granted limiting the question to the nature of offence and quantum of sentence. Facts of the case are clearly set out in the judgment of the trial court as well as of the High court. It is, therefore, not necessary for us to reiterate the same ex- cept slating that the appellant on 27/08/1975 at about 9 p.m. in the area of village Khuyan Sarwar committed the murder of Ramlal by beating him with the handle of a hand pump and causing him serious injuries due to which injuries he died three days thereafter, namely, on 29/08/1975 at 6.30 p.m. The motive for the occurrence is rather painful. The relevant portion of the judgment of the High court regarding the motive reads as follows:

"THE m



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top