A.M.AHMADI, M.M.PUNCHHI
Yeshwant Singh Kothari: Ananth Panse: Ramchandra Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of Indore – Respondent
Judgment
M.M.PUNCHHI, J.
(1) SPECIAL leave granted in these three connected petitions.
(2) EACH appellant in these appeals was an employee of the State Bank of Indore (a subsidiary bank of the State Bank of India), the first respondent in these appeals. They were initially in the employment of the Bank of Indore Limited which ceased to exist with effect from 1/01/1960 and became a subsidiary bank known as the State Bank of Indore, in the wake of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 (hereafter referred to as the "Act"). The existing employees of the kind of the appellants claimed to have certain service rights protected under Section 11 of the aforesaid Act inclusive of the right to continue till the age of 58 years. They were however made to retire before attaining the age of 58 years on different dates, but upon completing 30 years of actual service. The subsidiary bank claims to have exercised powers under Regulation 19(1 of the State Bank of Indore (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979 (hereafter referred to as the "Regulations"), in taking such steps.
(3) THE respective appellants moved the High court of Madhya Pradesh under Art
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.