SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 53

A.M.AHMADI, M.M.PUNCHHI
Yeshwant Singh Kothari: Ananth Panse: Ramchandra Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Bank Of Indore – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.Sanghi, A.RANGANADHAM CHETTY, A.V.RANGAM, M.C.BHANDARE, PRATIBHA JAIN, S.K.JAIN

Judgment

M.M.PUNCHHI, J.

(1) SPECIAL leave granted in these three connected petitions.

(2) EACH appellant in these appeals was an employee of the State Bank of Indore (a subsidiary bank of the State Bank of India), the first respondent in these appeals. They were initially in the employment of the Bank of Indore Limited which ceased to exist with effect from 1/01/1960 and became a subsidiary bank known as the State Bank of Indore, in the wake of the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959 (hereafter referred to as the "Act"). The existing employees of the kind of the appellants claimed to have certain service rights protected under Section 11 of the aforesaid Act inclusive of the right to continue till the age of 58 years. They were however made to retire before attaining the age of 58 years on different dates, but upon completing 30 years of actual service. The subsidiary bank claims to have exercised powers under Regulation 19(1 of the State Bank of Indore (Officers) Service Regulations, 1979 (hereafter referred to as the "Regulations"), in taking such steps.

(3) THE respective appellants moved the High court of Madhya Pradesh under Art













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top