SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 201

A.S.ANAND, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Sulochana Damodar – Appellant
Versus
Ratnaprabha V. Tople – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.BHASME, M.KARANJAVALA, NANDINI GORE, S.B.Bhasme, SURUCHI AGARWAL

Judgment

B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.

(1) THIS appeal is preferred by the tenant against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High court allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent-landlady. The eviction petition filed by the landlady was dismissed by both the courts below but on a writ petition filed by her it was allowed by the High court. The matter arises under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as "Bombay Rent Act").

(2) THE appellant is the tenant of Flat No. 2, F Building, Vijay Colony, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Bombay on a monthly rent of Rs. 100.00 exclusive of water charges, education cess and charges for amenities. The appellant had advanced a sum of rs 10,000.00 by way of construction loan to the original landlord. The said loan and the terms of repayment are recorded in a registered agreement dated 15/12/1962. According to the agreement, the landlord agreed to adjust Rs. 65.00 per month out of the rent payable towards the loan. The tenant was to pay the balance Rs. 35.00 in cash. The respondent purchased the flat on 7/01/1963, subject to the said agreement.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top