SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(SC) 387

K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY, A.M.AHMADI
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Ishwar Singh Khatri – Respondent


(1) IN the year 1982-83, Delhi Administration notified 654 vacancies of trained graduate teachers and asked the Employment Exchange to sponsor names of suitable candidates for appointment. The Employment Exchange during the period up to June 1984 sponsored as many as 4000 candidates. The Staff Selection Board headed by the Director/Additional Director of Education, Delhi Administration after interviewing the can- didates prepared panels containing an aggregate of 1492 names of selected candidates. The panels were displayed on the notice board stal- ing specifically that "the appointment will be in the order of merit, that appointment will be made from the select list till the last candidate is appointed". It was also stated in the minutes of the meetings of the Staff Selection Board that "the life of the panels of selected candidates will be valid for indefinite period". In some minutes it is stated, that "the panel of selected candidates will remain valid till all the candidates are offered appointments".

(2) DELHI Administration in the first instance appointed 527 candi- dates out of the selected panels and later on they appointed 127 more candidates. It is said th










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top