SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 852

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, S.C.AGRAWAL
Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bombay – Appellant
Versus
Forbes Forbes Campbell And Company LTD. , Bombay – Respondent


(1) THESE appeals arise out of the judgment of the Bombay High court dated 30/7/1976 in I.T. Reference No. 152 of 1975 which related to the assessment years 1964-65, 1965-1966 and 1966-67. The following two questions were referred to the High court:

1 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in holding that the sums of Rs. 98,730.00 for the assessment year 1964-65, Rs. 1,10,000.00 for the assessment year 1965- 66 and Rs. 81,000.00 for the assessment year 1966-67, representing provisions for gratuity were includible in computing the capital of the assessee company under Rule I of Schedule II of Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 for the purpose of Surtax?

2 Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in holding that the sums of Rs. 3,20,000.00 for the assessment year 1964-65, Rs. 3,48,943.00 for the assessment year 1965- 66, and Rs. 4,62,609.00 for the assessment year 1966-67, representing dividend reserves were includible in the computation of the capital of the assessee company under Rule I of Schedule II of the Companies (Profits) Surtax Act, 1964 for the purpose of surtax?

(2)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top