1. Dealer in synthetic gems — Tax liability under Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 — Exemption notification under Section 10. (Para 1 )
Back
Next 
1993 Supreme(SC) 335
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh : Yogeshwar Dayal
State Of Kerala
Versus
T.S.Govindarajulu Naidu
Case No. : 1643 , 1643-a of 1990
Date of Decision : 3/31/93
The court affirmed that synthetic gems are exempt from sales tax when they are covered by an exemption notification issued under Section 10 of the General Sales Tax Act.
Headnote:(A) General Sales Tax Act - Section 10 - Exemption notification - Synthetic gems - Liability to tax - Whether synthetic gems purchased in a state and sold outside the state are exempt from tax under a notification issued under the Act - High Court held that synthetic gems were exempt from payment of tax - Supreme Court agrees with the reasoning and conclusions of the High Court. (Para 1)
Facts of the case:
A dealer in synthetic gems purchased the items within a state and sold them in other places outside that state. The question arose whether the dealer was liable to pay tax under the state's general sales tax act.
Findings of Court:
The court found that the synthetic gems were exempt from the payment of tax under the Act, relying on the exempt notification issued under Section 10.
Issues: Whether the purchases and sales of synthetic gems made by the assessee were liable to tax under the state's general sales tax act.
Ratio Decidendi: The court upheld the High Court's conclusion that synthetic gems are exempt from tax based on the specific exempt notification issued under Section 10 of the relevant Act.
Result: Appeal dismissed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Table of Contents
2. Whether synthetic gems are exempt from tax under Section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. (Para 1 )
3. The court affirmed the High Court's reasoning and conclusions regarding the tax exemption of synthetic gems. (Para 2 )
4. Synthetic gems are exempt from tax under the notification issued under Section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. (Para 1 , 2 )
5. Appeal dismissed. (Para 2 )
6. Are synthetic gems taxable under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963?
No, synthetic gems are exempt from the payment of tax pursuant to the exempt notification issued under Section 10 of the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963. (Para 1 , 2 )
(1) THE respondent was a dealer in synthetic gems. He purchased the gems in the State of Kerala and sold the same in Tiruchy and other places outside the State. The question before the High court was whether for the purchases and sales made by the respondent-assessee, was he liable to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963? Relying upon the exempt notification issued under Section 10 of the Act the High court came to the conclusion that the synthetic gems were exempt from the payment of tax under the Act. This is the State appeal against the judgment of the High Court.
(2) WE have heard learned counsel for the appellant. He has taken us through the judgment of the High court which is reported in T.S. Govindarajulu Naidu v. State of Kerala. We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions reached therein. We see no ground to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High court. The appeal is dismissed. No costs.
