SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 335

KULDIP SINGH, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
State Of Kerala – Appellant
Versus
T. S. Govindarajulu Naidu – Respondent


(1) THE respondent was a dealer in synthetic gems. He purchased the gems in the State of Kerala and sold the same in Tiruchy and other places outside the State. The question before the High court was whether for the purchases and sales made by the respondent-assessee, was he liable to tax under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963? Relying upon the exempt notification issued under Section 10 of the Act the High court came to the conclusion that the synthetic gems were exempt from the payment of tax under the Act. This is the State appeal against the judgment of the High Court.

(2) WE have heard learned counsel for the appellant. He has taken us through the judgment of the High court which is reported in T.S. Govindarajulu Naidu v. State of Kerala. We agree with the reasoning and the conclusions reached therein. We see no ground to interfere with the impugned judgment of the High court. The appeal is dismissed. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top