SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 507

KULDIP SINGH, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Awadh Bihari Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

KULDIP SINGH, J.

(1) IT is not necessary to state the detailed facts and various legal submissions raised by the appellants before the High court as we are inclined to allow this appeal on the short ground that before passing the impugned order dated 8/02/1991 to the detriment of the appellants they were not afforded an opportunity of being heard by the respondents.

(2) THE appellants are working as Agricultural Inspectors (sic or) equivalent posts in the service of the State of Bihar. By an order dated 28/01/1988 the posts held by the appellants were upgraded and were brought under the Bihar Agricultural Service Class-11. It is not disputed that with effect from 28/01/1988 the appellants were treated as Class-11 Officers and were also paid the higher salary of Class-11 service.

(3) ON 8/02/1991 the State of Bihar issued the impugned notification downgrading the posts held by the appellants and as a consequence reducing the emoluments which they were drawing as Class- 11 Officers. It is not disputed that before issuing the said notification no opportunity was afforded to the appellants. The notification dated 8/02/1991 is on the face of i



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top