SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 756

G.N.RAY, P.B.SAWANT
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Chatterjee – Respondent


ORDER

1. Delay condoned. Special leave granted.

2. The Tribunal allowed the application of respondent-employee only on the ground that the inquiry report was not furnished to him. For this purpose, the Tribunal relied upon the decision of this Court in Union of India v. Mohd. Ramzan Khan((1991) 1 SCC 588 : 1991 Scc (L&S) 612 : (1991) 16 ATC 505 : AIR 1991 SC 471). Unfortunately, the Tribunal has not noticed the operative part of the judgment in the above case where it is made clear that the law laid down there will apply prospectively. Admittedly, in the present case, the order of dismissal was passed prior to the said decision. Hence the impugned decision of the Tribunal is set aside and the matter is remanded to the Tribunal for decision on merits on other points.

3. The appeal is allowed accordingly. There will be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top