SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 745

P.B.SAWANT, S.C.AGRAWAL
J. R. Kapoor – Appellant
Versus
Micronix India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GOHIL, BINU TARNTA, M.K.D.NAMBUDIRY, S.V.DESHPANDEY, SUDHANSHU BATRA, WILLS MATHEWS

Judgment

P.B.SAWANT, J.

(1) THIS appeal is directed against an interim order of the High court by which the appellant is injuncted from using the trade mark MICROTEL, the logo M and the carton for manufacturing and selling his products which consist of electrical and electronic apparatus, instruments, TV boosters and TV tuners.

(2) WE have heard the learned counsel on both sides. We also examined the trade marks and logos as well as the cartons used by both the parties for selling their respective products. We also examined the relevant authorities on the subject, cited by the learned counsel.

(3) THE undisputed facts are that both the respondent-plaintiff as well as the appellant-defendant manufacture and sell various electrical and electronic goods, cable TV, aerial boosters, solid state boosters etc. The appellant was one of the partners of the firm, viz., M/s Micronix India along with the respondent- plaintiff. The firm was manufacturing and selling the said electrical and electronic products, apparatus and instruments etc. since 21-9-1977. The said firm had a registered trade mark, viz., MICRONIX and logo IM I being shown in the well of M and





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top