SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 434

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh : N.P.Singh
Ram Kishan
Versus
U.P.State Roadways Transport Corporation
Case No. : 2441 of 1993
Date of Decision : 4/23/93

(1) SPECIAL leave granted.

(2) RAM Kishan and his wife Prabhawati are the appellants before us. Their son Hem Chand died as a result of accident on 2/03/1974. The boy was run over by bus No. UTB-109 belonging to U.P. State Roadways Transport Corporation. It was being driven by one Bhagwat Prasad Misra. The driver was prosecuted under S. 279/304-A Indian Penal Code and was convicted by the court. The appellants filed an application for compensation along with an application for condonation of delay before the Motor Accident Claims tribunal, Jaunpur in the year 1977. By its order dated 4/08/1978 the tribunal rejected the prayer for condonation of delay and dismissed the application as time-barred. The first appeal filed by the appellants before the High court was dismissed on 7/12/1981.

(3) APPELLANT Ram Kishan, in support of the application for condonation of delay before the tribunal, stated that his young son having died in the accident, he was deeply bereaved and was not in his senses. He further stated that he did not know the court procedure and as such he consulted one Ram Lakhan Upadhyaya, advocate who advised him that an application for compensation before the Motor Accident Claims tribunal could be filed after the decision in the criminal trial against the accused-driver. The criminal trial concluded on 28/11/1977 and thereafter he filed the application before the Motor Accident Claims tribunal in December 1977.

(4) ALTHOUGH the story put forward by the appellants, for not filing the application for compensation within the period of limitation, does not sound convincing but keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, especially the extreme shock under which the appellants were labouring, we are of the view that the Motor Accident Claims tribunal should have condoned the delay and decided the claim on merits.

(5) WE allow the appeal, set aside the judgment of the tribunal and of the High court, condone the delay in filing the application for compensation before the Motor Accident Claims tribunal, Jaunpur and remand the case to the Tribunal for decision on merits after hearing the parties in accordance with law. The tribunal shall decide the application expeditiously and preferably within six months from the date of the receipt of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top