SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 501

A.M.AHMADI, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Pratul Kumar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


(1) THE learned counsel for the State of Bihar states that all the persons, allegedly involved in the commission of crime in question in regard to which Case Nos. 144 and 162 of 1992 came to be registered have since been arrested and are in jail. Therefore, so far as that part is concerned nothing further remains to be done.

(2) HOWEVER, because of the atrocities committed by the police, three young lives were lost. One of them was a bachelor while the other two were married and left behind their young widows. We think that in order to ensure that they do not have difficulty on account of this loss some ex-gratia payment must be made to them. We direct that an ex-gratia payment of Rs. 25,000.00 each be paid to the widows of the married persons and the parents of the bachelor. In order to ensure that this money is not frittered away, we direct the District Judge concerned of Jagannathpur to ensure that proper arrangements are made so far as the utilisation of the amount is concerned. We, therefore, direct the State Government to deposit the money with the District Judge of the area comprising Jagannathpur Police Station who will inform the beneficiaries about this cou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top