SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 248

B.L.HANSARIA, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Escorts LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


(1) THESE appeals are preferred against the order of the government of India in a revision petition filed under Section 36 of the central Excise Act, as it obtained at the relevant time.

(2) THE appellant imported certain industrial fittings for 400 KV Transmission Lines in the year 1977. He presented the Bill of Entry on 26/2/1977. He classified the said imported goods under the then obtaining tariff item 73.33/40 and paid the appropriate duty thereon. The duty payable under the said tariff item at that time was 100% duty and 20% additional duty. Having paid the duty, he cleared the goods. Subsequently, the appellant says, he entered into correspondence with the Customs Authorities regarding the appropriate tariff item under which the said goods ought to have been classified. He says that he received the letter dated 26/10/1978 from the authorities, which according to the appellant, supports his contention that the said goods must be subjected to duty not under tariff item 73.33/40 but under tariff item 85.18/27 which attracts a far lower rate of duty.

(3) BE that as it may, the appellant filed an application for refund on 9/10/1978, even before receiving the












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top