Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Kuldip Singh, N.P. Singh
HYDRO CHAINS PVT. LTD., APPELLANT
VERSUS
THOMAS T. MARATTUKALAM (DEAD) BY LRS., RESPONDENTS.
Civil Appeal No. 721 of 1994 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 22029 of 1993),
decided on February 3, 1994.
Rent Control Rules - Applicability of Rule 25 - The court approved the view taken by Mr. Justice Raju in the impugned order in CRP No. 1513 of 1993, regarding the applicability of Rule 25 of Madras Rent Control Rules.
Fact of the Case:
The court heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and acknowledged the existence of two prevailing views in the Madras High Court on the applicability of Rule 25 of Madras Rent Control Rules.
Finding of the Court:
The court agreed with and approved the view taken by Mr. Justice Raju in the impugned order in CRP No. 1513 of 1993, decided on 1-11-1993, and dismissed the appeal.
Issues: The main issue was the applicability of Rule 25 of Madras Rent Control Rules, which had two prevailing views in the Madras High Court.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was influenced by the view taken by Mr. Justice Raju in the impugned order, which led to the approval of his interpretation of the applicability of Rule 25.
Final Decision: The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded.
ORDER
1. Special leave granted.
2. We have heard Mr. G. Ramaswamy learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. It is no doubt correct that as at present there are two views prevailing in the Madras High Court on the applicability of Rule 25 of Madras Rent Control Rules. We, however, agree with and approve the view taken by Mr. Justice Raju in the impugned order in CRP No. 1513 of 1993, decided on 1-11-1993. The appeal is dismissed. No. costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
