SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1993 Supreme(SC) 679

P.B.SAWANT, YOGESHWAR DAYAL
Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Ram Gopal Sharma – Respondent


ORDER

1. The questions which fall for consideration in the present appeals are as follows :

(1) What is the status of the order of dismissal and therefore of the dismissed employee between the date of the order of dismissal and the approval of dismissal under Section 33(2)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 ?

(2) Does the employee become entitled to being treated as never to have been dismissed from service if the application filed by the employer under Section 33(2)(b) is not approved ?

(3) Is the requirement of the approval under Section 33(2)(b) a mere technicality the non-compliance of which does not vitiate the order or is it a condition precedent to the order being rendered valid ?

(4) Does the order of dismissal remain inchoate and is not effective till it is approved under Section 33(2)(b) ?

2. We have heard learned counsel on both sides at considerable length. Various decisions were cited before us and we find that two Benches consisting of three learned Judges have taken the view that if the approval is not granted under Section 33(2)(b), the order of dismissal becomes ineffective from the date it was passed and, therefore, the employee becomes entitled to wages from


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top