SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1992 Supreme(SC) 885

G.N.RAY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Achhan Rizvi – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GOHIL, A.P.MEDH, A.Subhashini, Alka Agrawal, Atul Chitale, D.P.GUPTA, GOBINDA MUKHOTY, K.J.SINGH, K.K.GUPTA, K.K.VENUGOPAL, M.M.KASHYAP, MILON BANERJI, N.SHARMA, O.P.Sharma, R.C.GUBRELE, R.Jain, R.K.GARG, S.K.BHATTACHARJEE, S.K.Suri, U.R.Lalit, V.K.S.Chaudhary, V.Sharma

ORDER

1. Mr. Gobinda Mukhoty, learned counsel submitted his arguments at 2.00 p.m. and included at 3.40 p.m. Thereafter, Mr. O. P. Sharma, learned counsel commenced his arguments and had not concluded at 4.00 p.m. when the Court rose for the day.

2. List the matters on 7-12-1992 at 2.00 p.m.

Court Master

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top