SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 265

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
State Of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Maharau Srawan Hatkar – Respondent


Advocates:
A.S.BHASME, G.K.BANSAL

(1) SINCE the respondent had not been represented, we requested learned Advocate Shri G.K. Bansal, to assist the court which he accepted and has given good assistance for which we express our gratitude to him.

(2) THIS appeal by special leave arises from the judgment of the Division Bench of the High court of Bombay in First Appeal No. 169 of 1987, dated 24/4/1987. Notification under Section 4(1 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") was published on 13/8/1979 in the State Gazette acquiring the land for percolation tank in Village Kasampura. The Land Acquisition Officer by his award dated 17/12/1981 awarded the compensation. At the instance of the claimants, on reference under Section 18 of the Act, the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Jalgaon in his award and decree dated 25/10/1983, enhanced the compensation. It would appear that no appeal was preferred. After the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act 68 of 1984 had come into force on 24/9/1984, the claimants made an application to the reference court for awarding the enhanced solatium, additional compensation and interest under the Amendment Act. The Civil Judge by his order dated 31/3/1986 allowed the ap














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top