(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) WE have heard the counsel on both the sides. The appellant was appointed as a Temporary Constable on 9/9/1982. After his undergoing training, he was posted to 7th Bn. The central Services (Temporary Service) Rules, 1966 (for short "the Rules") and other rrom that date. The appellant when questioned the same in the central Administrative tribunal in CA No. 1969 of 1988, by order dated 15/12/1993 it had dismissed the petition and his review application also was dismissed. Thus, this appeal.

(3) IN the counter-affidavit it was stated that from the perusal of his service record it was observed that the appellant had absented himself wilfully in an unauthorised manner on 65 occasions from time to lime during his entire service of six years and he was not found fit for issue of quasi-permonency by various officers and was awarded punishment of censure and period of absence without pay after regular departmental enquiry. That the appellant was found toe a habitual absentee and incorrigible type of police employee and this could have set a bad example to other employees of the uniformed force. The appellant had not shown any capacity or devotion