K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
J. Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
T. R. Dhananjaya – Respondent
(1) SHRI S. Swatantra Rao has appeared in person and has filed an affidavit. He is examined. On his attention being drawn to what finds place in the order of this court passed on 1/9/1995, he states that what has been mentioned therein as regards his meeting one of us (K. Ramaswamy, J.) is correct. On being further asked as to whether he had met on his own or at the instance of anybody, his reply is that he had done so on his own and then brings to our notice the statements made by him in the affidavit.
(2) WE have perused the affidavit which was verified at Bangalore on 7/9/19955. It has mentioned the "sequence of events" leading to his meeting Honble Mr Justice K. Ramaswamy. It states that having read in the newspaper, while on a tour to West Bengal, about the judgment of this court imposing sentence on Shri J. Vasudevan, on his return to Bangalore he tried to contact Shri Vasudevan to console him. He was informed that Shri Vasudevan was not available in Bangalore and that he was still in Delhi.
(3) ON 29-8-1995 it was told to the deponent that Shri Vasudevan was in a shock and despair and that the sentence imposed would be implemented within a day or two.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.