SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 927

K.RAMASWAMY, B.L.HANSARIA
J. Vasudevan – Appellant
Versus
T. R. Dhananjaya – Respondent


Advocates:
F.S.NARIMAN, Gopal Singh, K.R.NAGARAJA, M.T.George, M.VIRAPPA, P.Mahale

(1) SHRI S. Swatantra Rao has appeared in person and has filed an affidavit. He is examined. On his attention being drawn to what finds place in the order of this court passed on 1/9/1995, he states that what has been mentioned therein as regards his meeting one of us (K. Ramaswamy, J.) is correct. On being further asked as to whether he had met on his own or at the instance of anybody, his reply is that he had done so on his own and then brings to our notice the statements made by him in the affidavit.

(2) WE have perused the affidavit which was verified at Bangalore on 7/9/19955. It has mentioned the "sequence of events" leading to his meeting Honble Mr Justice K. Ramaswamy. It states that having read in the newspaper, while on a tour to West Bengal, about the judgment of this court imposing sentence on Shri J. Vasudevan, on his return to Bangalore he tried to contact Shri Vasudevan to console him. He was informed that Shri Vasudevan was not available in Bangalore and that he was still in Delhi.

(3) ON 29-8-1995 it was told to the deponent that Shri Vasudevan was in a shock and despair and that the sentence imposed would be implemented within a day or two.












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top