B.L.HANSARIA, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, K.RAMASWAMY
G. Sridharamurti – Appellant
Versus
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation LTD. – Respondent
(1) LEAVE granted. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.
(2) AN open space measuring 66.6 x 40 feet comprised in Survey No. 432/25 in Ward No. XVII situated at Bangalore-Bellary Trunk Road in the city of Bellary, was in the possessIOn of Esso Company pursuant to a lease dated 17/7/1969 granted by the appellant- Esso Company was merged into respondent-corporatIOn on 14/3/1974. The appellant filed evictIOn petitIOn under SectIOn 21(1(f) of the Karnataka Rent Control Act (for short, the Act) for ejectment on the ground of sub-letting, impleading Esso Company and thereafter, the respondent-corporatIOn. The Esso (AcquisitIOn of Undertakings in India) Act, 1974 (for short, the Esso Act) came into force w.e.f. 13/3/1974. The courts below dismissed the applicatIOn on the ground that the Esso Company had not sub-let the demised premises but by virtue of a statutory operatIOn under the Esso Act, the respondent-corporatIOn stood transposed as a tenant which is an involuntary- act pursuant to SectIOn 7 of the Act; and notwithstanding the specific embargo created under SectIOn 2l(1(f) of the Act, it cannot be construed to be a sub-letting. The High court also reached the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.