SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1119

K.VENKATASWAMI, J.S.VERMA
Suresh Chandra – Appellant
Versus
State Of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
R.B.MISHRA, R.K.BHATTACHARJI, T.N.Singh

Judgment

K. VENKATASWAMI, J.

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) HEARD counsel on both sides.

(3) THIS appeal by special leave is preferred against the Judgment and Order in FAFO No. 994 of 1994 of the Allahabad High court dated 22/9/19944. The appellant while working as Beldar, to be more specific, while pouring water on the wheels of the roadroller moving on the road. met with an accident on 8/5/1989. As a result of the said accident, the appellants right leg had to be amputated. As the accident was due to the negligence on the part of the person who drove the roadroller belonging to the first respondent, the appellant moved a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims tribunal, Etawah. claiming a sum of Rs. 5,30,000.00. The tribunal found that the negligence was on the part of the person who drove the roadroller. It may be mentioned at this place that the regular driver who was permitted to drive the said roadroller was on leave and the cleaner who had no licence factually drove the roadroller on the date of accident. The tribunal, on the basis of the evidence placed before it. awarded a total compensation of Rs. 1,45,000.00 with interest at 12%.

(4)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top