SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1225

S.B.MAJMUDAR, B.P.JEEVAN REDDY
Managing Director, Madras Metropolitan Water Supply And Sewerage Board – Appellant
Versus
R. Rajan – Respondent


Advocates:
A.RANGANADHAM CHETTY, A.V.RANGAM, CHANDAN RAMAMURTHI, HARISH N.SLAVE, N.B.SHETYE, S.VAIDYALINGAM

Judgment

B.P. JEEVAN REDDY, J.

(1) LEAVE granted. Heard counsel for the parties.

(2) THESE appeals are preferred against the judgment of the division bench of the Madras High court disposing of writ appeals, preferred by the respondents, with certain directions.

(3) THE respondents, R. Rajan and C.A. Rajan, are the secretary and President respectively of the Association of Assistant Engineers in the service of the Madras Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Board). Disciplinary action has been initiated against them under the Madras Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board Employees (Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1978 (Regulations). After the receipt of the Enquiry Officers report, the General Manager of the Board issued notices to the respondents calling upon them to submit their defence, if any, within seven days of the receipt of the said notices. A copy of the Enquiry Officers report along with depositions of witnesses was enclosed with the said notices. At that stage, the respondents approached the Madras High court by way of writ petitions contending that the Board is bent upon dismissing them from service, that they w








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top