SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1015

S.B.MAJMUDAR, G.N.RAY
Dakaya Alias Dakaiah – Appellant
Versus
Anjani – Respondent


Advocates:
AMAN VACHHER, Dhruv Mehta, S.K.MEHTA, S.U.K.SAGAR, T.N.RAO, V.NARENDRANATH

(1) LEAVE granted

(2) HEARD learned counsel for the parties. This appeal is directed against the decision of the High court of a. P. dated 13/2/1993 passed in Civil Revision Petition No. 2824 of 1994. By the said impugned judgment, the A. P. High court has dismissed the revision application made against the order dated 4/7/1994 of the Additional Chief Judge. City Small Cause court. Hyderabad in RA No. 203 of 1992 affirming the order dated 29/4/1992 passed by the Pri. Rent Controller, Secunderabad in RC No. 316 of 1988

(3) THE respondent-landlady made an application under Section 10 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the A.P. Rent Act) for eviction of the tenant-appellant on the ground of wilful default of payment of rent for the period September 198 8/11/1988 amounting to Rs. 1,125.00. There is no dispute in this case that the tenant failed to make the payment within the stipulated period for the said months. It, however, appears to us that the landlady gave a notice to the tenant on 6/12/1988 claiming payment of rent for the said months of September 198 8/11/1988. The landlady, however, demanded surr




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top