SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 1195

B.L.HANSARIA, K.RAMASWAMY
Sheo Nandan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.VERMA, DEBA PRASAD MUKHERJI, N.N.GOSWAMY, S.B.SANYAL, SANJAY GHOSH, V.K.VARMA, VASIM A.QADRI

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE appellant entered Railway service as Shunting Porter on 26/4/1955. It would appear from the service record that his date of birth was declared to be 22/1/1926. On 7/1/1984, the appellant was informed that he was to retire on 31/1/1984 (A.N.), since he attained the superannuation on 21/1/1984. Thereon, the appellant gave a reply staling that his date of birth was 22/1/1936 and that therefore the order of retirement is not correct. Accordingly, he approached the High court by filing Writ Petition No. CWJC No. 353 of 1984 which was transferred to the tribunal. The tribunal rejected the said writ petition holding that the Union of India was not a party. Then he filed OA No. 306 of 1989. The tribunal by order dated 4-4-1990 dismissed the application on the ground of res judicata. Thus this appeal by special leave.

(3) THE contention of the appellant supported by Shri Sanyal, learned Senior Counsel, is that the appellant had declared his date of birth as 22/1/1936 which could be reflective from the periodical medical inspection reports made by the authorities which noted that as his date of birth. The respondents have deliberately withheld




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top