SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 800

K.S.PARIPOORNAN, SUHAS C.SEN, S.P.BHARUCHA
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Associated Cement Companies LTD. – Respondent


(1) THE only point that is urged in this appeal relates to the third proviso to Section 36(2 which was introduced into the central Excises &: Salt Act, 1944, by the central Excises and Sait and central Boards of Revenue (Amendment) Act, 1978. This Amendment Act also introduced Section 11A into the principal Act but Section IIA was brought into force only on 17/11/1980.

(2) SECTION 36(2 gives to the central government the power to call for and examine the record of any proceeding in which any decision or order has been passed under S. 35 or 35(A) of the principal Act, for the purpose of satisfying itself as to its correctness, legality or propriety and to pass such order thereon as it thinks fit. The second proviso thereto states that "no proceedings shall be commenced under this Ss. in respect of any decision or order (whether such decision or order has been passed before or after the coming into force of this sub-section) after the expiration of a period of one year from the date of such decision or order". The third proviso to Section 36(2 reads thus :

"PROVIDED also that where the central government is of opinion that any duty of excise has not been levied or



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top