SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 608

R.M.SAHAI, S.B.MAJMUDAR
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Collector Of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.GANGULY, B.Y.Kulkarni, DILIP TANDON, SOLI J.SORABJI, V.K.VARMA, VASIM A.QADRI

Judgment

S.B.MAJMUDAR, J.

(1) THIS group of Civils moved by the same appellant M/s Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited under Section 35-A of the central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") against the Union of India and the authorities concerned raise a common question of law for our consideration. That question is to the following effect - "whether the appellant who exported the excisable goods concerned as ships stores for consumption on board vessels bound for any foreign ports has to pay on these goods excise duty as per Rule 13 of the central Excise Rules or whether the appellants goods are liable to pay excise duty as per Rule 12 of these Rules".

(2) A few relevant introductory facts leading to these appeals are required to be noted at the outset, 1. Facts leading to Civils Nos. 2855 and 2856 of 1985

(3) THE appellants filed a refund claim for a sum of Rs. 18,859.50p being the duty paid by them on Light Diesel Oil (LDO) supplied as ships stores for foreign-going ships. The supplies were made on seven different occasions during the period from 15/2/1977 to 20/4/1978. The LDO so supplied was charged to basic e





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top