SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 1122

M.N.VENKATACHALIAH, K.RAMASWAMY
Ganga Prasad Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
A.SHARAN, ASHOK DESAI, B.B.Singh, HARISH N.SLAVE, L.R.SINGH, RANJIT GHOSAL

(1) LEAVE granted.

(2) THE appellant, while working as an Assistant Professor, was promoted as an Associate Professor in Neurosurgery, by proceedings dated 17/9/1993. In the meanwhile, Dr Basant Kumar Singh, Respondent 7, had already filed a writ petition claiming the right for promotion as an Associate Professor, Neurosurgery. During its pendency, the promotion of the appellant came to be made. Therefore, the writ petition was amended questioning the promotion of the appellant. The High court in the impugned order dated 12/1/1994 in CWJC No. 2832 of 1993 allowed the writ petition, set aside the promotion of the appellant and directed the respondent to consider the matter afresh in the light of the judgment of this court in Arun Kumar Agrawal (Dr) v. State of Bihar. Thus this appeal by special leave.

(3) THE controversy lies in a short compass. Admittedly, the appellant is not possessed of the qualification prescribed for super-speciality, namely, M.Ch. Admittedly, both the appellant and Respondent 7 had the qualification as M.S. General Surgery. In addition, 7th respondent had the qualification of M.Ch. in the speciality concerned, namely, Neurosurgery, acqui



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top