SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(SC) 317

M.K.MUKHERJEE, S.MOHAN
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation LTD. – Appellant
Versus
Raja D. V. Appa Rao Bahadur – Respondent


(1) WE have heard both the learned counsel at length.

(2) WE are clearly of the opinion that the judgment under appeal cannot be supported in law. For arriving at this decision, a few facts are required to be stated.

(3) ON 1/11/1954, the property forming the subject-matter of Civil was leased in favour of Caltex (India) Limited (a foreign company). On 19-10- 1976, the landlord filed a suit for ejectment against the said foreign company. On 30/12/1976, Ordinance No. 15 of 1976 came to be promulgated the Caltex [Acquisition of Shares of Caltex Oil Refining (India) Limited and of the Undertakings in India of Caltex (India) Limited] Ordinance, 1976. This Ordinance came to be replaced by Act 17 of 1977 on identical provisions. That need not concern us very much. However, what is important to notice is clause 7 of the said Ordinance is as under :

"7. (1 Every right or interest in respect of any property in India (including a right under any lease or under any right of tenancy or any right under any arrangement to secure any premises for any purpose) which Caltex (India) held immediately before the appointed day, shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top