SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 797

B.P.JEEVAN REDDY, M.K.MUKHERJEE
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
R. K. L. D. Azad – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K.SRIVASTAVA, ANIL KATIYAR, NIKHIL NAYAR, P.P.MALHOTRA, T.V.S.N.Chari

Judgment

M.K. MUKHERJEE, J.

(1) SPECIAL leave granted.

(2) THE two short questions that are required to be answered in these appeals are: (i) whether a person who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 (Act for short) can be dismissed from service for committing an offence under the Act even after he had retired on attaining the age of superannuation? and (ii) whether a Junior Commissioned Officer of the Indian Army who has to his credit the minimum period of qualifying service required to earn a pension or gratuity is eligible for the same in case he is dismissed from service under the provisions of the Act? The questions arise in the wake of the following undisputed facts.

(3) WHILE employed as a Junior Commissioned Officer in the Indian Army the respondent herein was placed under closed arrest on 7/8/1990 pending his trial by a General court-Martial for an offence under Section 64(e) of the Act. Since the respondent was due to retire on 31/8/1990 on attaining the age of superannuation the Army authorities passed an order on 23/8/1990, extending a his subjection to the Act till completion of the trial. In the trial that commenced from 1/11/1990 and en














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top